Applying Just Culture to improve investment decisions

Showing posts with label Windlab. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Windlab. Show all posts

Thursday, 15 November 2018

Winds of change at Windlab (ASX:WND)


Windlab wind farm Winscape


15/11/2018

Trav Mays
 


Description

Windlab (ASX:WND), formed in 2003, is an international renewable energy development company, with projects in Australia, Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania and USA. The company is involved in wind generation projects from development through to operating.

Windlab is currently transitioning into a more revenue sustainable model, whereby they retain a % of the project after the development stage allowing them to collect a reoccurring dividend. Traditionally they have sold the project at or near financial close generating a 5 – 10x return; the expected return from continuing on with a % of the project is an IRR between 8 – 15%.

Dr Nathan Steggal and Dr Keith Ayotte, currently employed as General Operations Manager and Chief Scientist respectively, whilst working for CSIRO developed Windscape, Windlab’s premier wind mapping technology.

Company

Windlab has to date, successfully completed 9 projects with a combined total of 1093MW of renewable power capacity, with their transition to a more stable revenue model mostly going to plan. The graph below shows their increase in recurring revenue, assuming that the Kennedy Energy Park and financial close of Lakeland will be completed within 2018, this however is no longer the case. InfraRed, who had previously signed a non binding term sheet to provide 100% of the equity for the construction of Lakeland has since pulled out, “citing its inability to price risk associated with the project’s grid connection, including risk of network losses and risk of curtailment.” These are very real risks, especially in the remote areas where the network connections are “weak” and therefore are unable to withstand the large fluctuations of power from renewables. To limit the effects on the connection, the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) can require additional equipment be installed to strengthen the grid, however even with this, AEMO has the ability to curtail the amount of energy entering the network from a project. Windlab states that “With high quality wind resources and full development approvals, Windlab remains confident in the Lakeland project and will continue to work towards financial close of Lakeland as quickly as possible. However, given this unexpected development, it is likely that financial close of the project will be delayed into early 2019.”   
               
Windlab's recurring revenue growth

Source: Windlab Results Presentation

Windlab co owns (50% Windlab, 50% Eurus Energy) Kennedy Energy Park, which is Australia’s first Wind, Solar and storage renewable energy facility to be constructed on Australia’s National Energy Network. The $160M project began construction in December 2017 and is forecast to have construction and commissioning completed in the early part of the last quarter 2018.

Windlab is using the Kennedy Energy Park to demonstrate that wind power is not in direct competition with solar, but complements it. This is clearly seen on the graph below, which shows that wind generation reduces when solar is most productive and increases when it is less productive, at the Kennedy Energy Park, except for in the early morning. The combination of the two allows for a more even distribution, reducing curtailment and network effects.

WInd and solar generation at kennedy energy park
Renewable energy curtailment penetration rate

Source: Windlab Results Presentation

Along with this, Windlab was recently been awarded approval for the first wind farm within Tanzania, for up to 300MW of capacity. They have also successfully secured an Energy and Environment Partnership grant from the Ministry of Affairs of Finland to help fund this project. The first phase of the project will be able to power nearly 1 million average Tanzanian homes.

Management

Windlab has a diverse and experienced management team. Roger Price, board member since 2007 and CEO since 2011, has over 30 years experience working within technological companies, most notably the CEO of Reino International. Reino is an Australian start up providing technically advanced parking solutions. Roger led an aggressive growth strategy, growing Reino from 30 staff to over 300 within 2 years whilst overseeing 4 acquisitions. Along with his current position he is also a General Partner of Innovation Capital an early stage venture capital fund, investing in Australian technology companies (Innovation capital is the current largest shareholder of Windlab, with 18.71% of shares). Roger owns 1.95% or $1.5mill (@$1.1/share) of Windlab.

Complimenting Roger’s leadership skills is Joseph O’Brien, an Independent non - executive board member, who brings nearly 20 years of consulting and project development experience within the electricity supply industry. He has worked with in both the electrical infrastructure and trading markets, bringing a more holistic understand of the market to Windlab. Roger owns .54% or $0.19mill (@$1.1/share) of Windlab.

Pippa Downs as a Non Executive Director since July 2017, brings over 25 years of international banking and finance experience. Charles Macek has over 15 years of board experience and John Cooper who has over 10 years of experience on boards in both executive and non-executive roles in the engineering, mining, property and construction industries. They own .2%, .3% & .25% respectively.

The Board combines together extremely experienced people with diverse backgrounds and a set of skills that compliments one another perfectly. Along with their experience, they are reputable people, a number of which are members of different charity boards.


Competitive advantage

Windlab’s competitive advantage is its Windscape technology, which is able to map and pinpoint high wind resource sites. The advantages of which can be seen in the next 2 graphs. They have the 2 highest sites measured by capacity in Australia with the predicted vs actual graph, showing the accuracy of the software.

Australian wind farms output performance capacity factor

Coonooer Bridge wind farm predicted vs actual capacity factor

Source: Windlab Results Presentation

Macro Overview

The renewable energy sector has had very favorable tailwinds over the last 10 years. Australia continues on the longest Bull Run in history, complementing this is ageing coal fired power stations, the Paris agreement and a global move towards renewable energies. The result of which was the Renewable Energy Target, an Australian Government mandated target of 33000 GWh or at least 20% of electricity being produced by renewables by 2020.

Due to a large increase in investment in 2017, Australia is on track to meet the Renewable energy target, with Bloomberg New Energy Finance predicting a slowdown in investment with a collapse post 2020.

Breakdown of renewable energy investment within Australia

Following on from the Renewable Energy Target, a National Energy Guarantee has been proposed, however this so far has had little support and there doesn’t appear to be growing bipartisan support for this or any other scheme. It has been forecast that without a government mandated renewable energy target that the investment in renewable energies will dry up, however the International Renewable Energy Agency has predicted a 21% reduction in the cost of onshore wind by 2019, bring the levelised cost of energy (LCOE) down to $30/MWh, the cost of coal from a producing plant is currently $40/MWh, making it not only cheaper than new coal but existing coal.

While there is a very low chance that a renewable energy policy will be decided on the national level in the short term, states have declared their own renewable energy targets. Queensland has a goal of 50% of power to be generated from renewable energies, which will require between 4000 – 5500MW’s of new renewable projects being completed before 2030, along with this, they have a goal of having net zero emissions by 2050.

This is of exceptional  importance to Windlab, as the next graph shows, an increase in Queensland’s mix of renewable power to include just over 50% wind power, will eliminate the need for any further storage and still keep curtailment below 10%.
Storage needs for varying wind and solar mixes

Source: Windlab Results Presentation

Along with Queensland, a number of other states have self imposed renewable energy targets. NT also has a 50% renewable energy target by 2030, Vic 25% by 2020 and 40% by 2025, SA 50% by 2025, Tas 100% by 2022 and ACT 100% by 2020. Along with these targets QLD, VIC, NSW, TAS, ACT and SA have a goal of having net zero emissions by 2050. These goals will need a combination of renewable energies to be achieved. Below is Bloomberg’s forecast renewable energy mix, if correct, onshore wind will make up a large percentage of Australian Electricity.

Breakdown of predicted energy generation in Australia
Source: Windlab Results Presentation

Competition

Infigen Energy is Windlab’s main Australian competition, however given the business model of Windlab, I believe that they are more comparable with a development and construction company. With this in mind, below is the ranking of Windlab and Infigen FY2017 figures. As you can see, Windlab has better figures for EBITDA/EV, P/S, EV/S, P/TB, P/E, EV Multiple and Z score (7 of the 9).

Windlab evaluation vs infrigen

Using a conservative multiple of 50% of IFN’s 2017 EV multiple on WND’s last year figures gives a share price of $2.99.

Catalyst

The pulling out of InfraRed on the Lakeland project has resulted in Windlab having a negative return for FY2018. This has resulted in a large decrease in the share price from a high of $1.68 to $1.1 in four months.

Windlab's asx share price

However given the talent and experience of the management team, this coupled with their experience with weak connections in outback Queensland, has resulted in an excellent buying opportunity. They are well positioned to take advantage of the Queensland government’s renewable energy target and have diversified their country risk by having an international focus.

They have a strong balance sheet with $8.3mill in cash and only $2.9mill in borrowings. In the worst case scenario, assuming they keep their expenses and reoccurring revenue the same and have no additional projects, it would take 2.65 years for them to run out of cash.

Reason to not invest

The connection and curtailment risks associated with the outback Queensland projects these combined with the potential slowdown in renewable investment within Australia are very concerning and real risks. Windlab, may be unsuccessful in finding another firm to supply equity for the construction of Lakeland, resulting in a large loss of resources and future revenue. While they have reduced their country risks, they have subsequently increased their foreign exchange risk as well as increased their political risk by targeting countries with less stable governments than Australia.

Recommendation

Windlab is an example of an excellent value company. A strong balance sheet, excellent staff and with a proven technological advantage, Windscape. The recent removal of finances from InfraRed and an uncommon business model has resulted, in my opinion, in a very undervalued business.

Whilst on a Federal level there may be no renewable energy target in the near future, to meet the state renewable energy targets, a large amount of investment is going to be needed. With the advantages of combining solar with wind (where wind is available) a large percentage of investment will need to be put into wind infrastructure. Windlab’s ability to pick high wind resources sites coupled with their demonstrated ability to see projects through from the initial stage to operation, puts Windlab in an excellent position to take advantage of the situation. I believe that Windlab will be an excellent long term investment.

Thanks for reading


Just Culture Investor


Trav Mays


The author is a current owner of a portion of Windlab, given this, they may be subject to one or a number of biases, more specifically anchoring and/or confirmation bias. This article is neither general nor personal advice and in no way constitutes specific or individual advice. The website and author do not guarantee, and accept no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained on this website or on any linked site. This website is not a substitute for independent professional advice and users should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances. The material on this website may include the views or recommendations of third parties, which do not necessarily reflect the views of the website or author, or indicate its commitment to a particular course of action  

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Latest post

New Site